From Anecdotes to Real-Life Examples: A Mixed-Methods Survey on Self-Deception

Written by Mara Georgiana Moldoveanu, Laura Visu-Petra, & Henry Otgaar on 30 September 2025. Posted in Volume XXIX, Nr 2

Authors

Mara Georgiana Moldoveanu^1,2,3, Laura Visu-Petra^1,4,*, & Henry Otgaar^2,3

¹ Research in Individual Differences and Legal Psychology (RIDDLE) Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania
² Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
³ Faculty of Law and Criminology, KU Leuven, Belgium
⁴ Department of Social and Human Research, Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

Self-deception, a motivated process of maintaining false beliefs despite contrary evidence, is often depicted using anecdotes and philosophical hypotheses, with emerging yet scarce empirical data. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and frequency of self-deception in the general population, gather real-life examples, and explore essential elements and characteristics of self-deception (e.g., intentionality, awareness, motivations, contradictory evidence, strategies used to maintain self-deception). Participants (N= 228 university students, Mage = 21.7, SDage = 2.46, 71.9% women; the total number of respondents varied per question) received a mixed-methods survey with open-ended and multiple-choice questions on experiences of self-deception. Dispositional self-deception was also measured using the Self-Deceptive Enhancement Scale of the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS; Paulhus, 1998). Findings revealed a high prevalence of self-deception (91.3%, n = 200) with high reported frequency (50.5%, n = 122). Participants reported denying and exaggerating information, due primarily to intrapersonal motivations (e.g., increased well-being and self-confidence). Self-deception was maintained by largely ignoring or avoiding contradictory evidence, and new evidence and social feedback led to its retraction. Notably, while dispositional self-deception was lower in our sample than in normative populations, it was negatively associated with the reported frequency of (situational) self-deception. The study discusses the importance of understanding essential elements and characteristics of self-deception in everyday situations and its relevance for legal settings.

Keywords: self-deception, false beliefs, motivated false beliefs, self-deceptive enhancement, denial

PAGES:175-206

doi:10.24193/cbb.2025.29.09

* Corresponding authors:
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.